700+ Do follow Social Bookmarking Site List

December 14, 2008 at 8:28 am · Filed under Social Bookmarking sites ·Tagged , ,

1. zoogim.com
2. your-bookmark.com
3. yoorl.com
4. yfoozle.com
5. xoogle.net
6. xnul.com
7. www.xbot.cc
8. www.zuggu.com
9. www.zoogim.com
10. www.zoeblog.com
11. www.zlitt.com
12. www.zippe.net
13. www.yourlinkgoeshere.com
14. www.yourbookmark.biz
15. www.your-bookmark.com
16. www.xnaportal.com
17. www.xmaui.com
18. www.world-fiesta.com
19. www.wordofblog.org
20. www.woffa.com
21. www.wobblog.com
22. www.wirefan.com
23. www.wikio.com
24. www.wideopenmic.com
25. www.whitelinks.com
26. www.weekend-directory.com
27. www.weddingplanner777.com
28. www.webpopper.com
29. www.webmomsplace.com
30. www.webmaster911.com
31. www.webkabel.nl
32. www.webexpresspro.com
33. www.web2me2.com
34. www.we-cms.info
35. www.vroomr.net
36. www.votultau.ro
37. www.votefreemedia.org
38. www.vindianz.com
39. www.video-marketing.org
40. www.vidballot.com
41. www.verzeichnis.ovalnets.de
42. www.vastdirectory.com
43. www.vao.net.pl
44. www.v0v.com
45. www.uvouch.com
46. www.usethesource.com
47. www.urlex.info
48. www.upstartblogger.com
49. www.upchuckr.com
50. www.undeal.com
51. www.unbridledlearning.com
52. www.tutorialsforall.com
53. www.tricromedia.com
54. www.torqq.com
55. www.toptubes.net
56. www.topstumbles.com
57. www.toppen.nu
58. www.top-hackers.com
59. www.tools4web.net
60. www.toastednation.com
61. www.to-visit-vietnam.com
62. www.tnblogwatch.com
63. www.thoof.com
64. www.thinkrenotahoe.com
65. www.thinkgrids.com
66. www.thelosthub.com
67. www.theanimalnet.com
68. www.the-rss-directory.com
69. www.thatinfofix.com
70. www.th3scoop.com
71. www.templatespace.net
72. www.tektag.com
73. www.tednews.com
74. www.tedigo.net
75. www.tagzoogle.com
76. www.tagza.com
77. www.tagoodle.com
78. www.tagne.ws
79. www.tagji.com
80. www.taggly.com
81. www.taggar.be
82. www.tagfacts.com
83. www.tagcloud9.com
84. www.tabletpccounter.com
85. www.syncone.net
86. www.swappractices.com
87. www.susanhatedliterature.net
88. www.stumpview.com
89. www.stuffs4u.com
90. www.studentup.com
91. www.strollby.com
92. www.strictly.ca
93. www.strategicboard.com
94. www.stork-games.com
95. www.stirrdup.com
96. www.steelcitymusic.ca
97. www.starton.us
98. www.startator.com
99. www.startaid.com
100. www.starsbuzz.com
101. www.squigglr.com
102. www.spurl.net
103. www.spotonce.com
104. www.spokanenews.org
105. www.sokmotortoppen.net
106. www.socialdanger.com
107. www.socialbookmarkingsite.com
108. www.socialbookmarking.us
109. www.socialbookmark.in
110. www.smutdb.com
111. www.skypeteer.com
112. www.sk-rt.com
113. www.sitejot.com
114. www.singa-property.com
115. www.simpy.com
116. www.siamtopsite.com
117. www.shoutwire.com
118. www.shareddish.com
119. www.share-news.net
120. www.shakenow.com
121. www.setmusicfree.info
122. www.searchles.com
123. www.sdas.com
124. www.scuttleplus.com
125. www.scroople.com
126. www.scrigg.com
127. www.scicastlive.com
128. www.schoolblogvote.com
129. www.sagabyte.com
130. www.safertoys.org
131. www.rscheata.com
132. www.rojo.com
133. www.rockvibes.net
134. www.respider.com
135. www.recipe-buzz.com
136. www.realarticle.com
137. www.rawtraining.com
138. www.ratingg.com
139. www.rapid-i.org
140. www.rankufc.com
141. www.rankalo.net
142. www.ramnathinfotech.com
143. www.queerfmnews.com
144. www.qoomla.com
145. www.putvote.com
146. www.ps3news.com
147. www.proxiestoday.com
148. www.projectfunk.com
149. www.pricetags.org
150. www.possibility.co.in
151. www.portachi.com
152. www.politicsnews.ca
153. www.plugim.com
154. www.plugamug.com
155. www.pliggtemplates.eu
156. www.pliggplace.com
157. www.playtowininternetcasino.com
158. www.pinoymug.com
159. www.pillfish.net
160. www.photoxels.com
161. www.philoi.com
162. www.phetchit.com
163. www.persiandirectory.ca
164. www.peopleicio.us
165. www.pcmagvote.com
166. www.pbtimes.net
167. www.patternstash.com
168. www.pakquest.com
169. www.pagestacker.com
170. www.oylinki.com
171. www.oyax.com
172. www.optimiz.us
173. www.ontheditch.net
174. www.onlywire.com
175. www.onlinelinks.ro
176. www.onlinegamingdirectory.com
177. www.onlinebookmarkmanager.com
178. www.online-movies-free.com
179. www.onedepot.com
180. www.oncologyzone.com
181. www.olgn.net
182. www.nutmouth.com
183. www.nulify.com
184. www.nichemastersites.com
185. www.ngcity.net
186. www.newsweight.com
187. www.newsthumper.com
188. www.newsroom.ie
189. www.newspoo.com
190. www.newskiwi.com
191. www.newsdots.com
192. www.newsdoggy.com
193. www.newscola.com
194. www.newsbigg.com
195. www.netvouz.com
196. www.mywebdesktop.net
197. www.myvmarks.com
198. www.mysocialbookmarkers.com
199. www.mysitevote.com
200. www.mypinkink.com
201. www.mypinkcheese.com
202. www.myoutdoornews.com
203. www.mylinkvault.com
204. www.myfreeproxy.be
205. www.myfavoritesonline.com
206. www.myfavlinks.com
207. www.mycartel.co.uk
208. www.mybookmarks.com
209. www.my-architecture.com
210. www.mvptimes.com
211. www.muzikvids.com
212. www.mumlatz.com
213. www.mumdinger.com
214. www.muchdirectory.com
215. www.motherapproves.net
216. www.moneyclicker.com
217. www.moneybyauction.com
218. www.mobleo.net
219. www.mixx.com
220. www.miniatory.com
221. www.minddeposit.com
222. www.mindcow.com
223. www.memestreams.net
224. www.megite.com
225. www.mcpaige.com
226. www.master-baiting.com
227. www.marktd.com
228. www.markaboo.com
229. www.maple.nu
230. www.manoj.co.in
231. www.majeeka.com
232. www.lunabeannation.com
233. www.ludicrous.net
234. www.lucazone.info
235. www.lostmarks.com
236. www.liveserv.org
237. www.listerlister.com
238. www.linxserver.com
239. www.linqued.com
240. www.linkvote.com
241. www.linkswarm.com
242. www.linksprocket.com
243. www.linksnarf.com
244. www.linksavenue.com
245. www.linkets.com
246. www.linkagogo.com
247. www.link-mania.org
248. www.lickmyblogs.com
249. www.lessonportal.com
250. www.latestramblings.com
251. www.laflink.com
252. www.ladykillr.com
253. www.kwoff.com
254. www.kwcloud.com
255. www.klikeranje.com
256. www.kitchenlackey.com
257. www.kit-graphik.com
258. www.kez6.com
259. www.kaplunkit.com
260. www.kapely.net
261. www.kaboodle.com
262. www.journaldigest.eyst.org
263. www.joomocracy.com
264. www.jonhs.com
265. www.jetmarks.com
266. www.jeqq.com
267. www.jediresourcecenter.org
268. www.jackool.com
269. www.jackhumphrey.com
270. www.itdirectory.be
271. www.it-ideas.com
272. www.intresting.co.in
273. www.insane.gr
274. www.info4it.com
275. www.indiarooster.com
276. www.indiantags.com
277. www.indianpick.com
278. www.indianpad.com
279. www.indiamarks.com
280. www.independentescortsoflasvegas.com
281. www.incestfeed.com
282. www.impera-victoria.com
283. www.ilovethislife.net
284. www.ikeepbookmarks.com
285. www.ignitionforce.com
286. www.ifoundgeorgetown.com
287. www.ifaves.com
288. www.idiggronpaul.com
289. www.i89.us
290. www.hun.ch
291. www.hugg.com
292. www.htnn.net
293. www.housingdiscussion.com
294. www.hotbuzz.in
295. www.hot2canada.com
296. www.hostprint.com
297. www.hoodiadietpillcom.com
298. www.homebusinessvoices.com
299. www.hmmpost.com
300. www.hiphoppick.com
301. www.highvibeit.com
302. www.hebbet.com
303. www.healthhunters.net
304. www.harrrd.com
305. www.haohaoreport.com
306. www.hanzoweb.com
307. www.halo3films.com
308. www.hackysackdirectory.com
309. www.gsdirectory.net
310. www.gregyboy.com
311. www.greendope.com
312. www.greatonlineresource.com
313. www.got2see.info
314. www.googleorbust.com
315. www.google.co.in
316. www.globusport.com
317. www.givealink.org
318. www.gfoozle.com
319. www.getboo.com
320. www.georgferdinand.nl
321. www.geordies.net
322. www.gecku.com
323. www.gd-sites.com
324. www.gcurious.com
325. www.games-news-2.com
326. www.gamerflex.com
327. www.gadgetsieve.com
328. www.gaddiposh.com
329. www.gabbr.com
330. www.fuzzfizz.com
331. www.furl.net
332. www.fuelmyblog.com
333. www.fsudir.org
334. www.freespeechproject.com
335. www.freelink.org
336. www.freedownloads2all.com
337. www.frassle.net
338. www.foxiewire.com
339. www.formyvote.com
340. www.forexindexy.com
341. www.foreseeably.com
342. www.folkd.com
343. www.fl-rt.com
344. www.findnot.com
345. www.feedest.com
346. www.fcc.com
347. www.favoritoo.com
348. www.favoor.com
349. www.fantasysportsexperts.com
350. www.fallingskies.com
351. www.f1mad.com
352. www.ez4u.net
353. www.excites.com
354. www.everytingjamaican.com
355. www.everythingblack.com
356. www.evening-news.ru
357. www.esnips.com
358. www.eprowl.com
359. www.emodrama.com
360. www.elk-grove-ca.com
361. www.eldridge.to
362. www.edensavr.org
363. www.eclecticpunk.com
364. www.ebookmarking.com
365. www.ebonybbwatlanta.com
366. www.ebizdigger.com
367. www.eatthissite.com
368. www.easytahiti.org
369. www.easysubmit123.com
370. www.easybm.com
371. www.earthfrisk.com
372. www.dzugg.com
373. www.dzone.com
374. www.dvdshark.com
375. www.dua4me.com
376. www.drunkstunts.com
377. www.dropjack.com
378. www.doshcafe.com
379. www.disneylinks.com
380. www.diigo.com
381. www.digsex.org
382. www.diggonline.net
383. www.diggamovie.com
384. www.digga.se
385. www.digfree.net
386. www.developernewz.com
387. www.devdigger.com
388. www.desipitara.com
389. www.dekut.com
390. www.debategod.com
391. www.data-hotel.org
392. www.danzaslap.com
393. www.dailylineup.org
394. www.crebuzz.com
395. www.crapshare.com
396. www.crankk.com
397. www.craftjuice.com
398. www.costplusten.net
399. www.coolstart.org
400. www.contentpop.com
401. www.consumerbookreviews.com
402. www.connectedy.com
403. www.conk.org
404. www.complore.com
405. www.commonscontent.com
406. www.collegefun.info
407. www.coinopia.com
408. www.cmymark.com
409. www.cliqt.com
410. www.clipdeli.com
411. www.cipel.com
412. www.choowawa.com
413. www.chixy.org
414. www.chinamemes.com
415. www.chick-digger.com
416. www.chekakidogo.com
417. www.cheapr.com
418. www.celticfutures.co.uk
419. www.celmania.org
420. www.celebhungama.com
421. www.catchlive.com
422. www.carreview.co.in
423. www.canadawebdirectory.info
424. www.came2pass.com
425. www.cagedflame.com
426. www.business-startup.ie
427. www.bukmark.net
428. www.bryanhunsinger.org
429. www.bringr.com
430. www.bridgelist.com
431. www.bookmax.net
432. www.bookmarkus.eu
433. www.bookmarktracker.com
434. www.bookmarksync.com
435. www.bookmarks.nazariya.com
436. www.bookmarks-s.de
437. www.bookmarkall.com
438. www.bookmark4you.com
439. www.bookmark-tag.com
440. www.bonydo.com
441. www.bolsayfinanzas.com
442. www.bmaccess.net
443. www.blurpalicious.com
444. www.blogs4god.com
445. www.bloglot.com
446. www.blogevity.com
447. www.blogcatalog.com
448. www.blogbuzzr.com
449. www.blogadeal.com
450. www.blinkur.com
451. www.blinklist.com
452. www.blinkbits.com
453. www.blacknewsuniverse.com
454. www.bikeandhike.net
455. www.biginfosite.com
456. www.bibsonomy.org
457. www.betplug.com
458. www.bestofindya.com
459. www.bestandworstsites.com
460. www.baseballink.com
461. www.barth24.net
462. www.barksbookmarks.com
463. www.backflip.com
464. www.babadao.com
465. www.azpills.com
466. www.ausculture.com
467. www.astigg.com
468. www.articlesnetwork.net
469. www.articlesarchieve.com
470. www.artdiggity.com
471. www.art4heart.info
472. www.apitoday.com
473. www.anonymousproxylist.org
474. www.anniyalogam.com
475. www.americavotes2020.com
476. www.allrnb.org
477. www.admitt.com
478. www.acolitame.net
479. www.a1-webmarks.com
480. www.7minuteimpressions.com
481. www.7hobbits.com
482. www.7878748.com
483. www.76newsalways.com
484. www.2collab.com
485. www.2020code.com
486. www.1topix.com
487. wizdom.ch
488. wink.com
489. wideknow.com
490. whatslikeit.com
491. whatdoyouknowabout.com
492. wedigsearch.net
493. webverzeichnis.zimmer-mit-charme.eu
494. web2news.us
495. web2list.com
496. web-ave.com
497. washangeles.com
498. warious.com
499. wagg.it
500. votepress.com
501. votedmostpopular.com
502. votedlinks.com
503. vitvisky.com
504. videorake.com
505. veryhotlinks.com
506. venture-buzz.com
507. veille.esangathan.fr
508. v2tag.com
509. urlbump.com
510. unload.jp
511. under-link.com
512. tryhit.com
513. travelsuggest.us
514. tooright.info
515. toe-news.com
516. thatsi.com
517. tell.web.id
518. techtrend.com
519. tags.psyc.us
520. tags.bikersunite.org
521. tag.zurpy.com
522. tabmarks.com
523. swik.net
524. swapmarks.com
525. superwebcamgirls.com
526. supermodelsfalling.com
527. submitnews.savethesoldiers.com
528. spotback.com
529. sportsnewz.info
530. sports.newsby.us
531. sourceforge.net
532. socialbookmarkwebsite.com
533. socialbookmarksite.com
534. socialbookmarking.org
535. social-bookmarking.scriptil.com
536. sligg.net
537. slashdot.org
538. shoutingstones.net
539. shoprz.net
540. sherwyn.com
541. sharexa.com
542. sharebrain.info
543. share.websitemagazine.com
544. share-news.net
545. shakk.us
546. seoice.com
547. scriptmaking.com
548. scott.yang.id.au
549. sciencecentr.org
550. saysaid.com
551. sajberia.com
552. reviewmysite.temi.co.uk
553. rescue.web.id
554. reddit.com
555. reckondit.com
556. rapefeed.com
557. randomninja.com
558. quadriot.com
559. qiel.com
560. q8igg.com
561. puregraffiti.com
562. prube.com
563. primelinkz.com
564. potongstim.com
565. postnews.holmedmarket.com
566. popculturewiz.com
567. politicoemfoco.com
568. pliggplace.com
569. pligg.zeegal.com
570. pligg.se
571. pligg.scrum-on.com
572. pligg.huldransnatt.nu
573. pligg-template.com
574. planeterlang.org
575. pinoybee.com
576. pinglog.com
577. picandastory.com
578. phptut.li
579. panamanewsblog.com
580. palbe.net
581. oyax.com
582. outpost18.com
583. osnweb.com
584. opfiles.com
585. oks.ph
586. oinko.net
587. oamarks.sulekha.com
588. nybergmiller.com
589. npgb.org
590. notedby.us
591. ngetop.com
592. newzly.com
593. newz.890m.com
594. newsqb.com
595. newskicks.com
596. newsfinda.com
597. netvouz.com
598. netsay.net
599. myspacefun.org
600. mysitevote.com
601. mypage.ws
602. mydeallist.com
603. my.computingfreak.com
604. murl.com
605. motherapproves.net
606. morehello.com
607. moogme.com
608. mobiseer.com
609. mmog-world.com
610. men.netscape.com
611. members.ezinearticles.com
612. maxtags.com
613. matchpile.com
614. malaysiastory.net
615. majarty.com
616. ma.gnolia.com
617. lyricmonce.info
618. lolsci.com
619. littledidyouknow.com
620. linktagger.net
621. links.dosed.de
622. linkogle.com
623. linkni.cz
624. linkdigg.com
625. linkanarchy.com
626. lilisto.lilisto.com
627. lifeinnews.com
628. larisan.web.id
629. lankalife.com
630. labs.micronode.net
631. koolontheweb.com
632. kinomixx.com
633. kedet.com
634. jobhuntr.com
635. jigg.in
636. jetmarks.com
637. jeega.com
638. jaikinrox.lifelogger.com
639. isellular.com
640. iselect.ru
641. iphonewishlist.net
642. inshasta.com
643. infotain.ruwenzori.net
644. indiasphere.net
645. in.dexer.org
646. imp.etuo.us
647. ilovethislife.net
648. ihm.igcity.net
649. idoinow.info
650. idiomato.com
651. idiggweed.com
652. hoteldirectory.org.uk
653. hostsweb.org
654. highvibeit.com
655. hibookmark.com
656. heoju.new21.org
657. guruvu.com
658. guruslike.com
659. gullible.net
660. gruks.com
661. grubmodo.com
662. gregucci.com
663. gps.spotshoppingguide.com
664. gottoread.com
665. goodclothes.us
666. goodcarslinks.org
667. gethitt.com
668. getdickenscider.com
669. gd-sites.com
670. gameradam.com
671. gamelurk.com
672. gambigg.com
673. gadgetswanted.com
674. fungow.com
675. fsudir.org
676. frassle.net
677. foundit.open.ac.uk
678. forums.pligg.com
679. fliggr.com
680. firdaus.info
681. findomato.com
682. find-it-free.com
683. fil.es
684. feed.fastlanedaily.com
685. favorites.jumbee.net
686. faves.com
687. faved.net
688. facebump.com
689. en.pixels-xxx.com
690. elementalscape2.com
691. e-objave.com
692. dotslap.com
693. dohat.com
694. dofollow.us
695. directory.typosonline.com
696. directory.gfxclass.com
697. dingyy.com
698. dingdango.com
699. digufun.com
700. digimoe.com
701. diggdirect.com
702. diggdex.com
703. digg.woddow.com
704. digg.com
705. desigrade.com
706. demos.kubelabs.com
707. deliciousdroppings.com
708. del.icio.us
709. dealfollower.com
710. dealflare.net
711. de.lirio.us
712. curereach.com
713. cookingbase.com
714. continentalappliances.com.au
715. commonscontent.com
716. colecamplese.com
717. cloudytags.com
718. clipdeli.com
719. class-ass.com
720. clap.com
721. chess.mobengines.com
722. cgi.fark.com
723. cestou.cz
724. celebworld.info
725. cast6.com
726. canadabookmarks.com
727. campwii.com
728. bwsmith.com
729. bryanhunsinger.org
730. brokencontrollers.com
731. bookmarks.philippinecountry.com
732. bookmarks.ph
733. bookmarks.oneindia.in
734. bookmark.atnewz.com
735. bloogoz.com
736. bloglinkage.com
737. bloggerati.com.au
738. blizzardzz.com
739. blipoo.com
740. bliggi.com
741. blessedit.com
742. bharatinfo.com
743. bebo101.com
744. bcloud.com
745. bargains.aumate.com
746. b-ice.zeegal.com
747. audrajohnson.com
748. audirs4.mobengines.com
749. atout-prix.com
750. amennn.com
751. alkrwan.com
752. adspeech.com
753. addurl.freehostia.com
754. actualtopics.com
755. actionnooz.com
756. aboogy.com
757. 76newsalways.com
758. 6mix.net
759. 4new.info
760. 2total.com
761. 2esl.com
762. 1siteekle.com

Source: DP

Comments (5)

A huge list of Top Blog Directories

December 12, 2008 at 2:32 am · Filed under Top Blog Directories ·Tagged

www.blogcatalog.com/directory -          Reg /Free
www.blogpulse.com/ -                     Free
www.blogged.com/ -                       Free
dir.blogflux.com/ -                      Reg
www.globeofblogs.com/                    Free
www.bloghop.com/ -                       Free
www.blogexplosion.com/ -                 Reg / ?
www.bloggernity.com/ -                   Reg / ?
www.topblogarea.com/ -                   Free
blogs.botw.org/ -                        Paid
portal.eatonweb.com/ -                   Reg / ?
www.bloghub.com/ -                       Reg / ?
www.blogrankings.com/ -                  Free
www.bloggeries.com/ -                    Paid
www.lsblogs.com/ -                       Reg / Free
www.weblogalot.com/ -                    Free
www.blogdirs.com/ -                      Free
www.bloggapedia.com/submit.php -         Reg / Free
www.delightfulblogs.com/ -               Paid
www.blogs-collection.com -               Free
www.blog-directory.org/index.php -       Free
www.mynewblog.net/ -                     Reg / Free
www.5starblogs.com/ -                    Free
www.bloglinker.com/ -                    Reg / ?
www.bloguniverse.com/ -                  Paid
www.blogadr.com/ -                       Free
www.blogannounce.info/ -                 Paid
www.blogdire.com/ -                      Free
www.bloghints.com/                       $5 / Free
www.blogpoint.com/ -                     Free
www.quickblogdirectory.com/ -            Free
www.blogbunch.com/ -                     Free
www.blogoozle.com/ -                     Paid
www.all-blogs.net/ -                     Paid
www.bloggingfusion.com -                 Paid
www.superblogdirectory.com/ -            $6.99 / Free
www.wilsdomain.com/ -                    Free
www.blogtagstic.com/ -                   Paid
www.dofollowblogs.com
www.herblogdirectory.com
www.photarium.com
www.blogevity.com
www.submitblognow.info
www.blogdirectorysubmission.com
www.spillbean.com

Comments (1)

Get 50+ Free Real Estate Forum List

December 3, 2008 at 5:28 am · Filed under Real Estate Forum List ·Tagged , ,

Hi,

i am trying my best to provide you information, if any of these sites are not working then please let me know, if you having more list forums that are not mentioned here, please send me i will add them in this list.


Thanks to all of You.

===================================================================

http://www.realestateforum.com/

http://www.realestatewebmasters.com/forum.php

http://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/

http://www.realestatediscuss.com/

http://www.indianrealestateforum.com/

http://www.realestatetalks.com/

http://tucsonrealestateforum.com/

http://www.realestate.net.my/forum/

http://www.cavespot.com/forum/

http://www.spanishrealestateforum.com/

http://forums.redfin.com/rf/

http://www.reforums.net/

http://www.wannanetwork.com/discussion/index.php

http://www.fastrealestate.net/news/commercial-real-estate/

http://cracker.com.au/real-estate-housing-forum/house-sharing-forum/forums.htm

http://www.escapehomes.com/main.aspx?tabid=321

http://www.lvreforum.com/

http://forums.idahorealestateforum.com/index.php?act=home

http://forum.freeadvice.com/other-real-estate-law-questions-11/

http://rismedia.com/forums/

http://www.the-marketing-shop.com/forums/index.php

http://www.worldpropertylinks.com/

http://www.viprealtyforum.com/

http://www.youshouldown.com/forum/

http://www.iqrealestate.com/RealEstateBoard/

http://www.findpropertyusa.com/

http://www.arkadia.com/usa/forums/

http://www.syracuse.com/forums/realestate/

http://www.city-data.com/forum/real-estate/

http://www.cyburbia.org/forums

http://www.famousagents.com/forum/

http://www.sunnyislesmiamirealestate.com/Forum/default.htm

http://www.realestatetimes.in/forum

http://www.yourestate.info/

http://www.realestatebg.com/forum/

http://forums.houseandhome.com/index.php?s=f52c69e66adae4aac2873ce1b65c3ee8&

http://forum.homeone.com.au/viewforum.php?f=10

http://www.practicalrealestate.com/forum/

http://www.realestateforum.com/register.php

http://www.sitetutor.biz/forums.php

http://www.spaintalking.com/forum.php

http://www.somersoft.com/forums/

http://forums.french-property.com/

http://www.ukpropertyforums.net/

http://www.homesonsale.co.uk/forum/index.php

http://www.propertyshowrooms.com/forum/

http://www.propertydevelopmentforums.com/

http://forum.propertyweek.com/index.php

http://www.spanishpropertyinsight.com/forums/index.php

http://www.singingpig.co.uk/forums/?GroupID=10

http://www.overseaspropertymall.com/forum/

http://www.propertysecrets.net/forum.html

http://www.overseaspropertymall.com/forum/

http://www.pjnet.com.my/forum-5.html

http://www.uaepropertyforum.com/

http://forum.property-investments.net/

http://propertywomen.com.au/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=1

http://www.aussielegal.com.au/forum/forum_topics~FID~57.htm

http://www.incomepropertyforums.com/

http://tavira-property.co.uk/forum/

http://www.propertyportal.ae/forum/

http://forums.condosingapore.com/index.php

http://www.northcyprusforum.com/property/index.html

http://www.tech-unity.com/forums/

http://www.italymag.co.uk/forums/

http://www.slpoa.ca/_Forums/index.php

http://www.careerjet.hk/forums/

http://www.careerjet.hk/forums/

http://www.reao.com.au/forum/

http://forum.expatica.com/Purchasing-property-Germany-t102366.html

http://forums.xilinx.com/xlnx/

http://www.ecobob.co.nz/Login.aspx

 

britishexpats.com/forum

forum.amlaspain.com/

www.spanishpropertyworld.com/forums.cfm

www.homemove.co.uk/forums

forum.spanishpropertyguide.net/

www.spanishpropertyforumsl.com

Comments (1)

Affordable Press Release Submission Distribution Services by experts

September 6, 2008 at 9:45 am · Filed under Press Release ·Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Manual Press Release Submission Services in very Affordable Prices

What is a press release?

A press release is News story, written in third person, that seeks to demonstrate to an editor or reporter the newsworthiness of a particular person, event, service or product.

This press release submission and optimization service is designed to maximize the visibility of your press release in the news search engines and media databases. Critical to the success of your news release is ensuring your press release is keyword searchable for the best search terms. Submitawebsite provides network distribution and technology enhancements for your release. We carefully analyze your release and optimize it around key search terms that increase your online visibility.

Press Release Submission Service Includes:

* Professional Keyword Research
* Keyword Rich Anchor Text in Links
* Optimized for News Search Engines

Press Release Submission:

Our press release submission and writing service will get your press release in the news attraction by publishing it to 100 popular and respected press release sites. You will see an almost overnight improvement in the amount and quality of the traffic to your site.

Press Release is the best way to introduce new products and services releases.Press releases are a very economical method of building brand images, and creating great value of the product.. You will also benefit from a higher search engine ranking by the benefits of the incoming back-links from every press release website where your press release is published and also drive in Great and huge amounts of targeted traffic through your press release and website.

Our Press Submission and writing service assures :

* Absolutely non spam writing skills, genuinely hand written professional Content.
* No automated software will be used to perform submissions.
* Categorized perfectly and relevantly for release

We have experience in manual submission services and our process has evolved over time to become exceptionally efficient and reliable. We will furnish you with a clear report of all the submissions which will include screen shots of submission forms.

F.A.Q About our Press release Service :

Q. What details should I provide for you to write the press release?

Ans : We will need a brief information of your company and its activities. Also you can provide insight into the target audience or any specific data you wish to feature in the press release.

Q Do you offer revisions on press release?

Ans :Yes, we offer unlimited revision on press release until you are satisfied.

Q How long will it take to distribute the press release?

Ans : Normally it takes 3 working days to do the distribution. If you need the press release to be written, it will take another 1 working days.

Order Now For The Press Release Service :

Online PR Submission to 50+ popular PR websites $25

Online PR Submission to 75+ popular PR websites $35

** $3 for for 1 PR wirting

———————————————————–

Top populat sites

1. PRLog.org - Free Page Rank ToolAlexa Certified Traffic Ranking for www.prlog.org

2. Merinews.com - Page Rank CheckAlexa Certified Traffic Ranking for www.Merinews.com

3. PR-Inside.com - Free PageRank CheckerAlexa Certified Traffic Ranking for www.PR-Inside.com

4. IndiaPRWire.com - Free PageRank CheckerAlexa Certified Traffic Ranking for www.IndiaPRWire.com

5. PR.com - Page Ranking ToolAlexa Certified Traffic Ranking for www.pr.com

6. OpenPR.com - Page Rank CheckAlexa Certified Traffic Ranking for www.OpenPR.com

7. ClickPress.com - PageRankAlexa Certified Traffic Ranking for www.clickpress.com

8. PowerHomeBiz.com - Check Google Page RankAlexa Certified Traffic Ranking for www.PowerHomeBiz.com

9. 24-7pressrelease.com - PageRank Checking IconAlexa Certified Traffic Ranking for www.24-7pressrelease.com

10. NewsWireToday.com - PageRankAlexa Certified Traffic Ranking for www.NewsWireToday.com

11. TheOpenPress.com - Page RankAlexa Certified Traffic Ranking for www.TheOpenPress.com

12. BigNews.biz - Page Rank CheckAlexa Certified Traffic Ranking for www.BigNews.biz

13. PR-Canada.net - Display PagerankAlexa Certified Traffic Ranking for www.pr-canada.net

14. USPRWire.com - Free Page Rank ToolAlexa Certified Traffic Ranking for www.USPRWire.com

Submit a site….

Comments (4)

A new Browser by Google - Google Chrome

September 3, 2008 at 3:12 am · Filed under Latest SEO News ·Tagged , , ,

Google Chrome Review

 

Chrome

Before i start, let me just say that the only browsers i use are firefox (THE Browser) and IE (just to check if the pages that i develop appear correctly and work). So, in advance, i’m sorry if i point some feature in google Chrome that already exists natively in other browser.

Yesterday i finally got access to Google Chrome Download Page, some time after the anouncement made on google’s official blog. The expectation was high and Google didn’t disappoint.

First, the installation is very quick. I went to http://www.google.com/chrome , Clicked the big blue button, downloaded a setup file, and chrome was installed in no time. Simple, quick, straight to the point.

First thing i noticed: The speed!!! The browser loads in a flash (not like firefox that, at least in my computer, takes a little time to load). When i started to browse some pages, i was astonished with the load speed. 

Like google explained in the google chrome presentation comic book, chrome uses one process for each tab. This has several advantages. The ones that i best remember are:

  • If a page crashes, only that page is closed, not the browser;
  • When we don’t need a page, the process of that tab is closed and the memory allocated is released.
After this i decided to explore the developer suport that the browser offered. Well, i was amazed because chrome is only a beta and already has several features that are really useful. All of this without installing any plugin.
The dom inspector makes me remember Firebug. Can inspect every element and, at the same time, travel through the dom and see the styles aplied to each element. Yes, we already have this feature in firefox using firebug, but in chrome this feature is native, thats the beauty of it.
For javascript i found a console and a text mode debugger. I didn’t spent any time exploring them. Maybe one of this days i’ll take a few hours to explore this tools.
Finally two features that are really handy (at least for me):
  • native language corrector (it has some bugs, but this is only a beta, i give a discount).
  • element inspector in the right context menu.
Google Chrome surprised me. Fast, Simple, Lite. Can be both a browser for the common internet user, has it can be a browser for a developer. Google exceeded my expectations and proved, once more, to be a company that studies the market and knowns what the users want.
Chrome is going to be a first choice for now on. I’m official Chromed!!! I hope that future releases bring more and more new features to help improve even more this browser.

Download Google Chrome at http://www.google.com/chrome

Source: http://nunos.zi-yu.com

————————————————————

to download google chrome and use visit: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/google-chrome-now-live.html  or view this also

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/fresh-take-on-browser.html

some draw back of this all.

its only available for windows.

no extra plug in can be downloaded now for this.

google toolbar is not with this neither it can be downloaded till yet with this.

some times it seems using some features of IE8.0

Comments (3)

Being first in the search results is not always the right thing

August 21, 2008 at 11:43 pm · Filed under Latest SEO News ·Tagged , , , ,

The number one position on Google is something that most webmasters try to achive. Unfortunately, many webmasters don’t take the time to find the best keywords for optimization. This can lead to problems with pay per click and with organic search engine optimization.

Suppose you sell ovens on your website. Many webmasters think that it would be a good idea to optimize the website for keywords such as “oven” or “furnace”. It’s not and we’ll tell you why relying on the seemingly obvious keywords will cost you a lot of time and money.

You might lose money with every keyword

A new pay per click study shows that it is not profitable to have the first position for one to two words keywords. The most profitable positions in the paid results for short keywords were the fifth and the sixth position.

Keywords that consisted of three-words were profitable when the website was listed in the second or third position.

Why do people lose money when they bid for the first position?

One or two-word keywords are very general. That means that many companies think that their websites are relevant to these keywords. Many companies bid on the keyword and the keyword becomes very expensive.

In addition, general keywords don’t attract targeted visitors. People who enter “oven” in a search engine might be looking for an oven manual, they might search for dutch oven recipes, for industrial ovens and many other different things.

They might not be interested in buying a new oven, even if you offer them on your website for really good prices.

That means that the keywords are expensive and the visitors that you get through these short keywords are not targeted. For that reason, it is very difficult to get a positive return on investment for these short keywords.

Keywords that consist of three or more keywords are much more targeted and they have less competition. For example, it is much better to have high rankings for keywords such as “buy an oven” or “smith oven model xp356″ if you sell ovens.

People who whose multiple word keywords are in the compare or buying phase. They are more likely to purchase goods or services than those using fewer words (source: Oneupweb Research).

In addition, fewer people bid on multiple word keywords. For that reason, it makes sense to focus on these words.

How does this apply to organic search engine results?

While you don’t have to pay for every click if your website is listed in the organic search results, it takes some time and work to get listed in the top 10 results.

The competition for general one or two-word keywords is much higher than the competition for specific keywords that will deliver targeted visitors to your website.

If you want to have a good return on investment, you should concentrate on multiple word keywords. These keywords deliver much better visitors and it is easier to get high rankings for them.

You will lose a lot of time and money if you optimize your web pages for the wrong keywords. Take some time to find the best keywords for your website and then optimize your pages for keywords that deliver targeted visitors and buyers.

Comments (2)

What Google’s improved Flash indexing means for your website

August 19, 2008 at 3:42 am · Filed under Latest SEO News ·Tagged , , , ,

A month ago, Google announced that they had improved the way it indexes Flash files. Has something changed in Google’s search results in the meantime? Is this change good news for you if you have a Flash site?  

What has changed?

  1. Google can now index the textual content in SWF files of all kinds, including buttons, menus and self-contained Flash websites.
  2. Google can also discover URLs that appear in Flash files and it adds these URLs to the crawling pipeline.

What has not changed?

  1. Google still doesn’t recognize the text that appears on images. FLV files, such as YouTube videos also won’t be indexed because they don’t contain text.
  2. As many Flash websites consist of images and other multimedia elements, the only text that Google finds on these websites might be “Loading”, “Please wait” or “Copyright”.
  3. Google also cannot execute some JavaScript types. If your website loads a Flash file via JavaScript, Google might not be able to find your Flash file.
  4. In addition, Google cannot attach content from external sources that are loaded by Flash files. If your Flash page loads an HTML or XML file then these files will be treated as separate documents.

Why is Flash still a problem for search engines?

Flash content and regular HTML pages are fundamentally different. Just because Google can now index some text from Flash files doesn’t mean that Flash files are now search engine friendly. Here’s why:

  1. It’s hard to divide the text into meaningful sections. Flash doesn’t use <h1> or <p> tags to separate different sections of text. It’s hard to tell what’s important and what’s not. Even worse, Flash designers often break down words into their individual letters to create “cool” text effects. That means that search engines cannot index these texts.
  2. Usually, the complete content of a website is presented on the same URL. You cannot link to a special part of a Flash website. That means that it is also difficult for search engines to find the relevant section of the Flash site.
  3. In addition, this means that Flash websites don’t get good inbound links to the right pages. Most Flash websites only get links to their home page.
  4. The structure of Flash websites makes it difficult to get high rankings. Many Flash files are linked from other Flash files and no other websites link to these internal Flash elements. The lack of links from other websites makes it very difficult to get high rankings for these elements.
  5. Flash doesn’t use the basic SEO methods. You won’t find proper link texts, headline tags or even properly optimized title tags in most Flash sites. That makes it very difficult to get good rankings.
  6. Most Flash content is still not crawlable. As mentioned above, Google won’t index content in images and it has problems with JavaScript calls.

What can you do to improve your rankings if you have a Flash site?

If possible, avoid pure Flash websites and use Flash elements only when needed. If you must use Flash on your website, the following tips will help you to get better rankings:

Include the text and the links from the Flash file in an HTML version on the same page.
Use JavaScript and CSS to find out if the website visitor can parse Flash and then present the CSS DIVs that contain the corresponding content. Regular website users will see the Flash file, visitors who cannot parse Flash (for example search engines) will see the HTML version.

  1. Use CSS and create a layer with your regular HTML content and then position another layer with the Flash content above the HTML layer so that your website visitors only see the Flash content. Note that search engines might misinterpret this method as a spamming attempt.

Use different URLs for different sections of your website. Each set of content should have its own unique URL.

Flash has not been designed for search engines and it is extremely difficult to get high rankings with pure Flash sites. Using regular optimized web pages is the best way to get in Google’s top 10 results.

For SEO Services visit: http://www.unisoft-technologies.com/search_engine_optimization.htm or visit at: http://searchengineoptimizationdelhi.wordpress.com/

Comments (1)

How to check that my robots.txt file is working as expected?

August 11, 2008 at 11:40 am · Filed under Google Robot.txt file ·Tagged ,

The robots.txt analysis tool reads the robots.txt file in the same way Googlebot does. If the tool interprets a line as a syntax error, Googlebot doesn’t understand that line. If the tool shows that a URL is allowed, Googlebot interprets that URL as allowed.

This tool provides results only for Google user-agents (such as Googlebot). Other bots may not interpret the robots.txt file in the same way. For instance, Googlebot supports an extended definition of the standard. It understandsAllow: lines, as well as * and $ pattern matching. So while the tool shows lines that include these extensions as understood, remember that this applies only to Googlebot and not necessarily to other bots that may crawl your site.

————————————————————————–

 How do I block or allow Googlebot?

Blocking Googlebot

Google uses several user-agents. You can block access to any of them by including the bot name on the User-agent line of an entry. Blocking Googlebot blocks all bots that begin with “Googlebot”.
  • Googlebot: crawl pages from our web index and our news index
  • Googlebot-Mobile: crawls pages for our mobile index
  • Googlebot-Image: crawls pages for our image index
  • Mediapartners-Google: crawls pages to determine AdSense content. We only use this bot to crawl your site if AdSense ads are displayed on your site.
  • Adsbot-Google: crawls pages to measure AdWords landing page quality. We only use this bot if you use Google AdWords to advertise your site.

For instance, to block Googlebot entirely, you can use the following syntax:

User-agent: Googlebot Disallow: /Allowing Googlebot

If you want to block access to all but a single robot, you can use the following syntax (note: we don’t recommend doing this if you want your site to appear in the search results for other search engines such as MSN and Yahoo!):

User-agent: * Disallow: / User-agent: Googlebot Disallow:Googlebot follows the line directed at it, rather than the line directed at everyone.

The Allow extension
Googlebot recognises an extension to the robots.txt standard called Allow. This extension may not be recognized by all other search engine bots, so check with other search engines in which you are interested to find out. The Allow line works exactly like the Disallow line. Simply list a directory or page that you want to allow.

You may want to use Disallow and Allow together. For instance, to block access to all pages except one in a subdirectory, you could use the following entries:

User-agent: Googlebot Disallow: /folder1/ Allow: /folder1/myfile.htmlThose entries would block all pages inside the folder1 directory except formyfile.html.

If you block Googlebot and want to allow another of Google’s bots (such as Googlebot-Mobile), you can allow access to that bot using the Allow rule. For instance:

User-agent: Googlebot Disallow: / User-agent: Googlebot-Mobile Allow: / for more detail visit: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=40364 ——————————————————————————————— I don’t want to list every file that I want to block. Can I use pattern matching?

Yes, Googlebot interprets some pattern matching. This is an extension of the standard, so not all bots may follow it. Matching a sequence of characters using * You can use an asterisk (*) to match a sequence of characters. For instance, to block access to all subdirectories that begin with private, you could use the following entry: User-agent: Googlebot Disallow: /private*/

 

===========================================================================
If you are still not satisfied from these answers just visit at; http://www.robotstxt.org/faq.html get a whole world releated to robot.txt file.
                                              

Comments (1)

Know in detail about robots.txt file

August 11, 2008 at 11:34 am · Filed under Google Robot.txt file ·Tagged

for more detail visit: http://www.robotstxt.org/

Comments (1)

How to make a search Engine Friendly Sites

August 11, 2008 at 9:29 am · Filed under search engine optimization ·Tagged , , ,

We live in a day and age where people use search engines on a daily basis to find information, products or services. Web site owners who offer these things want to be found in the number 1 spot for a particular keyword phrase or at least on the first page of results. In order to obtain these prized positions, the engines have to make the decision that your site deserves that prestigious place. As web site owners or those who are responsible for the overall success of a site, how do we help the search engines come to this conclusion? While there may be many pieces of the puzzle to accomplish this, one of the foundational things that can be done is to make sure your site is “search engine friendly”.

What does that mean anyway - search engine friendly? Does it entail having an all text site because search engines love content? Does it mean sacrificing aesthetics because graphical components get in the way of search engines? Does it mean stuffing your pages with repetitive keywords or employing sneaky tricks? Actually none of these things are ingredients for a search engine friendly site. Additionally many are under the impression that one has to sacrifice the end user if they are to please the search engine. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Let me give you some basic ingredients that constitute a search engine friendly site but in doing so, always keep this principle in mind - your web site is for the end user, not the search engines

for more detail: Read This

for more guidelines just visit some of googles webmaster guidelines:

http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769#design

 

 

Comments (1)

biggest SEO Mistakes on database based sites

August 1, 2008 at 5:13 am · Filed under SEO ·Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ten SEO Mistakes Made on Database Driven Websites

Search engine friendly websites is one of those often heard phrases, both from web site development companies and from their clients. Everyone knows that this is important to have, and yet it is one of the things that is actually often overlooked.

Search engine optimisation companies actually spend a lot of their time analysing a website and removing barriers to the search engines ranking a site highly. At the web development level, it is possible to build a site that is perfectly search engine friendly. One of the hardest types of sites to get right though are database driven websites. Listed below are ten of the most common issues that are created, often unknowingly, in the development process of a dynamically generated web site.

1. Pages with duplicate content - not enough differential areas within the pages, so that only small areas of the page change from page to page. It is essential that enough of the page text changes for the search engines to see an appreciable difference between one page and the next.

2. Pages with duplicate page titles - the page title is a great indicator to the search engines of the primary content of the page. Whilst this is often unique on sites such as e-commerce websites, it is often overlooked in other sites, particularly where small areas of the site are generated from a database, such as news pages.

3. Pages with duplicate meta descriptions - again, this is easy to overlook and set a global or category level meta description. These give the search engines a reason to penalise your site for not giving them enough information, and again, creating a unique meta description for every page is an essential SEO task.

4. Using auto-generation of pages as a shortcut instead of creating good content. This is linked quite closely to point 1, where it is possible to create pages that have only a tiny percentage difference between them. Databases are fantastic ways of storing information, but you still need to put the work in to fill them with content. Unique information about the subject of the page will immensely help both the long tail and the ability of the search engines to determine that a page is valuable.

5. Creating pages that are hidden behind form submissions or javascript postbacks that cannot be accessed by a search engine crawler. This is far more common that is generally realised. For instance .NET creates postback links by default instead of proper links - potentially making huge sections of a site unreachable. Likewise, it is easy to hide lovely content rich areas of your site behind a drop down selector in a form that means certain areas of the site are not visible.

6. Too many query strings - this is a common bugbear of the professional SEO, where complicated database selections create deep levels of pages, but with seven or eight &id= type strings. Additionally, some bad development methodology can leave pages with null query strings that appear in every URL but don’t do anything. The answer to this is generally URL rewrites, creating much more search engine friendly and user-friendly URLs!

7. Putting query strings in different orders when accessed through different places - this can create duplicate content issues, which can cause major penalties.

8. Not using user language to generate automated pages - if you are going to create a database driven website that uses words in the query strings (or better in rewritten URLs) make sure that you use words that will help you with SEO - if you sell widgets, make sure you are using the word widgets somewhere in the URL instead of just product= or id= - keyword research can assist with this.

9. Not allowing the meta data and title to be edited easily after the site build. It is possible to hardcode the generation of meta information into a database that doesn’t allow it to be edited later. Creating a mechanism for modifying this information initially helps everyone at a later stage when the information needs changing without shoehorning it into an already developed structure.

10. Creating keyword stuffed pages by using auto-generation. Once upon a time, search engines quite liked pages with high densities of your keywords, but now these are likely to get you marked down rather than up. So be aware when creating pages that long pages with lots of your products on can create too high a density. For instance listing blue widgets, light blue widgets, navy blue widgets, sky blue widgets is going to create a page with a very dense page for the phrase “blue widgets”.

These are just 10 of the most common potential optimisation pitfalls when creating dynamic websites. There are many more facets to producing a great database driven site, including user friendliness, speed, performance and security, but they all add together to make the best solution to your needs.

Comments (1)

Google’s “Florida” Update

August 1, 2008 at 1:39 am · Filed under Hilltop Florida effect of Google ·Tagged , ,

 

On November 16th 2003, Google commenced an update (the Florida update) which had a catastrophic effect for a very large number of websites and, in the process, turned search engine optimization on its head. It is usual to give alphabetical names to Google’s updates in the same way that names are given to hurricanes, and this one became known as “Florida”.
In a nutshell, a vast number of pages, many of which had ranked at or near the top of the results for a very long time, simply disappeared from the results altogether. Also, the quality (relevancy) of the results for a great many searches was reduced. In the place of Google’s usual relevant results, we are now finding pages listed that are off-topic, or their on-topic connections are very tenuous to say the least.


The theories about the Florida update

The various search engine related communities on the web went into overdrive to try and figure what changes Google had made to cause such disastrous effects.

SEO filter (search engine optimization filter)
One of the main theories that was put forward and that, at the time of writing, is still believed by many or most people, is that Google had implemented an ’seo filter’. The idea is that, when a search query is made, Google gets a set of pages that match the query and then applies the seo filter to each of them. Any pages that are found to exceed the threshold of ‘allowable’ seo, are dropped from the results. That’s a brief summary of the theory.

At first I liked this idea because it makes perfect sense for a search engine to do it. But I saw pages that were still ranked in the top 10, and that were very well optimized for the searchterms that they were ranked for. If an seo filter was being applied, they wouldn’t have been listed at all. Also, many pages that are not SEOed in any way, were dropped from the rankings.

Searchterm list
People realized that this seo filter was being applied to some searchterms but not to others, so they decided that Google is maintaining a list of searchterms to apply the filter to. I never liked that idea because it doesn’t make a great deal of sense to me. If an seo filter can be applied to some searches on-the-fly, it can applied to all searches on-the-fly.

LocalRank
Another idea that has taken hold is that Google have implemented LocalRank. LocalRank is a method of modifying the rankings based on the interconnectivity between the pages that have been selected to be ranked. I.e. pages in the selected set, that are linked to from other pages in the selected set, are ranked more highly. (Google took out a patent on LocalRank earlier this year). But this idea cannot be right. A brief study of LocalRank shows that the technique does not drop pages from the results, as the Florida algorithm does. It merely rearranges them.

Commercial list
It was noticed that many search results were biased towards information pages, and commercial pages were either dropped or moved down the rankings. From this sprang the theory that Google is maintaining a list of “money-words”, and modifying the rankings of searches that are done for those words, so that informative pages are displayed at and near the top, rather than commercial ones.

Google sells advertising, and the ads are placed on the search results pages. Every time a person clicks on one of the ads, Google gets paid by the advertiser. In some markets, the cost per click is very expensive, and the idea of dropping commercial pages from the results, or lowering their rankings, when a money-word is searched on is to force commercial sites into advertising, thereby putting up the cost of each click and allowing Google to make a lot more money.

Comment on the above theories
All of the above theories are based on the idea that, when a search query is received, Google compiles a set of results and then modifies them in one way or another before presenting them as the search results. All of the above theories are based on the premise that Google modifies the result set. I am convinced that all the above theories are wrong, as we will see.

Stemming
Finally, there is a theory that has nothing to do with how the results set is compiled. Google has implemented stemming, which means that, in a search query, Google matches words of the same word-stem; e.g. drink is the stem of drink, drinks, drinking, drinker and drinkers. So far, this is not a theory - it’s a fact, because Google say it on their website. The theory is that, stemming accounts for all the Florida effects. Like the other theories, I will show why this one cannot be right.


Evidence

There are a number of evidences (Florida effects) that are seen in the results, but I won’t go into detail about them all. One piece of evidence that everyone jumped to conclusions about is the fact that you can modify the searches to produce different results. For instance, a search for “uk holidays” (without quotes) shows one set of results, but if you tell Google not to include pages that contain a nonsense word, e.g. “uk holidays -asdqwezxc” (without quotes), you will get a different set of results for some searches, but not for others. Also, the results with the -nonsense word looked the same as they were before the update began, therefore they appeared to be the results before a filter was applied.

This is what led people to come up with the idea of a list of searchterms or a list of money-words; i.e. a filter is applied to some searches but not to others. It was believed that the set of results without the -nonsense word (the normal results) were derived from the set produced with the -nonsense word. But that was a mistake.


What really happened

Although Google’s results state how many matches were found for a searchterm (e.g. “1 - 10 of about 2,354,000″), they will only show a maximum of 1000 results. I decided to compare the entire sets of results produced, with and without the -nonsense word, and compare them to see if I could discover why a page would be filtered out and why other pages made it to the top. I did it with a number of searchterms and I was very surprised to find that, in some cases, over 80% of the results had been filtered out and replaced by other results. Then I realised that the two sets of results were completely different - the filtered sets were not derived from the unfiltered sets.

The partners in each pair of result sets were completely different. The ‘filtered’ set didn’t contain what was left from the ‘unfiltered’ set, and very low ranking pages in the ‘unfiltered’ set got very high rankings in the ‘filtered’ set. I saw one page, for instance, that was ranked at #800+ unfiltered and #1 filtered. That can’t happen with a simple filter. It can’t jump over the other pages that weren’t filtered out. All the theories about various kinds of filters and lists were wrong, because they all assumed that the result set is always compiled in the same way, regardless of the searchterm, and then modified by filters. That clearly isn’t the case.

In it inescapable that the Google engine now compiles the search results for different queries in different ways. For some queries it compiles them in one way, and for others it compiles them in a different way. The different result sets are not due to filters, they are simply compiled differently in the first place. I.e. the result set without the -nonsense word, and the result set with the -nonsense word are compiled in different ways and are not related to each other as the filter theories suggest. One set is not the result of filtering the other set.

The most fundamental change that Google made with the Florida update is that they now compile the results set for the new results in a different way than they did before.

That’s what all the previous theories failed to spot. The question now is, how does Google compile the new results set?

Back in 1999, a system for determining the rankings of pages was conceived and tested by Krishna Bharat. His paper about it is here. He called his search engine “Hilltop”. At the time he wrote the paper, his address was Google’s address, and people have often wondered if Google might implement the Hilltop system.

Hilltop employs an ‘expert’ system to rank pages. It compiles an index of expert web pages - these are pages that contain multiple links to other pages on the web of the same subject matter. The pages that end up in the rankings are those that the expert pages link to. Of course, there’s much more to it than that, but it gives the general idea. Hilltop was written in 1999 and, if Google have implemented it, they have undoubtedly developed it since then. Even so, every effect that the Florida update has caused can be attributed to a Hilltop-type, expert-based system. An important thing to note is that the ‘expert’ system cannot create a set of results for all search queries. It can only create a set for queries of a more general nature.

We see many search results, that once contained useful commercial sites, now containing much more in the way of information or authority pages. That’s because expert pages would have a significant tendancy to point to information pages. We see that the results with and without the -nonsense word are sometimes different and sometimes the same. That’s because an expert system cannot handle all search queries, as the Krishna Bharat paper states. When it can’t produce a set of results, Google’s normal mechanisms do it instead. We see that a great many home pages have vanished from the results (that was the first thing that everyone noticed). It’s because expert pages are much more likely to point to the inner pages that contain the information that to home pages. Every effect we see in the search results can be attributed to an expert system like Hilltop.

I can see flaws in every theory that has been put forward thus far. The flaw in the seo filter idea is that there are highly SEOed pages still ranking in the top 10 for searchterms that they should have been filtered out for. The flaw in the LocalRank theory is that LocalRank doesn’t drop pages, but a great many pages have been dropped. The flaw in the list of searchterms is that if a filter can be applied to one searchterm, it can be applied to them all, so why bother maintaining a list. The flaw in the money-words list idea is that, if it ever came out that they were doing it, Google would run the risk of going into a quick decline. I just don’t believe that the people at Google are that stupid. The flaw in the stemming theory is not that Google hasn’t introduced stemming, it’s that the theory doesn’t take into account the fact that the Florida results set is compiled in a different way to the -nonsense set. Stemming is additional to the main change, but it isn’t the main change itself.

The expert-system, or something like it, accounts for every Florida effect that we see. I am convinced that this is what Google rolled out in the Florida update. Having said that, I must also add that it is still a theory, and cannot be relied upon as fact. I cannot say that Google has implemented Hilltop, or a development of Hilltop, or even a Hilltop-like system. What I can say with confidence is that the results without a -nonsense word (the normal results) are not derived from the results with a -nonsense word, as most people currently think. They are a completely different results set and are compiled in a different way. And I can also say that every effect that the Florida update has caused would be expected with a Hilltop-like expert-based system.


Where do we go from here?

At the moment, Google’s search results are in poor shape, in spite of what their representatives say. If they leave them as they, they will lose users, and risk becoming a small engine as other top engines have done in the past. We are seeing the return of some pages that were consigned to the void, so it is clear that the people at Google are continuing to tweak the changes.

If they get the results to their satisfaction, the changes will stay and we will have to learn how to seo Google all over again. But it can be done. There are reasons why certain pages are at the top of the search results and, if they can get there, albeit accidentally in many cases, other pages can get there too.

If it really is an expert system, then the first thing to realise is that the system cannot deal with all searchterms, so targeting non-generalised and lesser searchterms, using the usual search engine optimization basics, will still work.

For more generalised searchterms, the page needs to be linked to by multiple expert pages that are unaffiliated with the page. By “unaffiliated” I mean that they must reside on servers with different IP C block addresses than each other and than the target page, and their URLs must not use the same domain name as each other or as the target page. These expert pages can either be found and links requested or they can be created.



Latest

8th December 2003

Since soon after the Florida update began, some pages that disappeared from the results have been returning. In some cases they are back at, or close to, the rankings that they had before Florida. In other cases they are quite highly ranked but lower than before. Day after day, more of them are returning.

I put this down to Google recognizing that Florida caused a sharp decline in the quality (relevancy) of the search results. It appears that they are adjusting the algorithm’s parameters, trying to find a balance between the new page selection process and good relevancy. In doing so, some of the pages that were dumped out of the results are getting back into the results set, and they are achieving high rankings because they already matched the ranking algorithm quite well, so once they are back in the results set, they do well in the rankings.

Reminder
Don’t forget that all this is just theory, but what we see happening does appear to fit an expert sytem, although there can be other explanations. We can be sure that Google compiles the results sets in different ways depending on the searchterm, and that the Florida results are not derived, via one or more filters, from the -nonsense results, but we can’t yet be certain that an expert system is used to compile the Florida results set.

22nd December 2003

Google has now dealt with the -nonsense search trick of seeing the non-Florida results, and it no longer works. It doesn’t mean that they are not different to the Florida results; it’s just that we can no longer see them.

5th January 2004

Dan Thies, of Seo Research Labs, came up with the interesting theory that the Florida changes are due to Google now using Topic Sensitive PageRank (TSPR). His PDF article can be found here. It’s an interesting theory because, like the ‘expert system’ theory, it would cause Google to use 2 different algorithms depending on the searchterm used. To date, it’s the only other theory that I believe has a chance of being right.

For more visit: Google Florida update

Comments

What’s in Google’s Sandbox?

July 26, 2008 at 4:34 am · Filed under search engine optimization ·Tagged , , , , , ,

The Google Sandbox effect is an alleged restriction placed on new websites. The result is that a new site does not receive good rankings for its most important keywords and keyword phrases for few months. Even with good content, many inbound links, a new website may still adversely affected by the Sandbox effect. The Google Sandbox acts as a probation for new sites, probably to discourage spam sites from rising quickly, getting banned, and repeating the process.Thus the Google Sandbox is very similar to a new website being placed on probation whose rank is kept lower than expected in searches, prior to being given full value for its inbound links and content.

Why did Google create the Sandbox?

It is thought Google created the Sandbox filter for new sites to stop spam sites that purchase numerous inbound links, and rank highly for their keywords from the date of launch. As Google apparently considers a high number of links pointing to a site from the beginning to be rather suspicious, the inbound links are not considered to be natural. Another possibility is that spam sites would use various tactics to rise to the top of the search results, and gain heavy sales prior to being banned for violating Google’s Terms of Service; and then repeating the process continually. As a result, new sites are put on a probation period, and this effect is usually referred to as the Google Sandbox.

Is there really a Google Sandbox?

Not all SEO experts agree that Google Sandbox exists as a separate filter from other alleged Google filters. Many of them do not even agree that Google uses a system of filters at all. Skeptics believe that the phenomenon merely echoes already existing Google algorithm calculations, and the Sandbox effect is an illusion. Note that Google has all but admitted recently that the Sandbox filter is real.

Which sites are placed in the Sandbox?

While all types of new sites can be placed in the Google Sandbox, the problem appears much more frequently for new websites seeking rankings for highly competitive keywords and keyword phrases. All sites are likely to be given a term in the Sandbox, but those websites seeking rankings for keywords that are in high demand are probably in for a much longer duration in the sandbox.

Why some sites never seem to been in the Google Sandbox? You can avoid having your site in the Google Sandbox for several reasons. Sites targeting non-competitive keywords and phrases are often left out of the Google Sandbox as there is little point in applying the filter. Keep in mind, however, that even less competitive search terms can be Sandboxed, but their much shorter stay in the sandbox often goes entirely unnoticed.

How long is a site stays in the Google Sandbox?

Stays in the Google Sandbox can vary from one to six months, with three to four months being the averahe time frame. Less competitive searches will be given the much shorter stay in the sandbox, while hyper-competitive keywords will often spend six months in the sandbox. The filter will be gradually decreased over time, and will lose most of its dampening effect in about three months. However, for the most competitive search keyword phrases, the Sandbox filter might remain in full force for six months.

How do I know if a site is in the Sandbox?

If your site has a good Google PageRank and incoming links, and it shows up in search results for some secondary search phrases, but the site is nowhere to be found for the most important searches; then it is very likely the site has been placed in the Google Sandbox.

How to know if it’s the Sandbox and not a Google penalty?

If a site is punished from a Google penalty, the site would not appear in the Google search engine results pages (SERPs) for even the less important keyword searches. The site would also show no PageRank or even a grey bar on the Google Toolbar in case of Google penalty. The alleged Google Sandbox filter is apparently designed to concern itself with the more competitive keywords as they are more likely to have spam sites, purchased inbound links Google deems unnatural, and probably more manipulation attempts being made.

Will joining of Google AdWords or Google Adsense prevent being placed in the Sandbox?

Joining paid programs like Google Adwords and Google Adsense will have no effect on your site’s duration in the Google Sandbox. Those programs could provide much needed traffic while your site remains in the Sandbox. Participation in the various Google paid advertising programs will not keep your site out of Sandbox, or shorten your stay, despite what some myths would have you believe.

Are there any other Google filters like the Sandbox?

The alleged dampening filter on new incoming links is often mistaken for the Sandbox. Many search engine optimization experts think that new incoming links are not given immediate full credit. The purpose of that gradual passing along of Google PageRank and link popularity, is to discourage purchasing of incoming links, and various linking schemes designed only to increase a site’s standing in the Google search rankings.

How to get out of Google Sandbox ?

Time is the only real escape from the Sandbox. Depending on the competitiveness of your most important keywords, that time can vary from one to six months, with three to four months being the average duration. In the meantime, continue to improve your site contents, and be prepared to make a rapid rise once the Sandbox probation ends.

What should I do while my site is still stuck in the Sandbox?

While your site is stuck in the Sandbox, it’s best to continue adding fresh keyword rich content and new incoming links to your site. Adding inbound links will ensure that they lessen any possible new link dampening filter that might be in effect. The links would be well aged, and ready to pass along their full value of PageRank and link popularity, as the site comes out of the Google Sandbox.

So it is better to concentrate on adding more keyword rich pages, and don’t forget both on page and off page factors. On the page, make sure your title tags match the most important keywords for that page. It is a good idea to add a site map and be sure that all of your pages link properly to one another with appropriate link anchor text containing the keywords for that page. Off page link anchor text should be set up to include keywords for the receiving page as well. This will make sure that when the filter is lifted, your improved site will rise rapidly to its proper place at the top of the search rankings.

Should I keep getting new links to my website while in sandbox?

The Sandbox is an ideal time to start adding incoming links to your site. Because of the alleged new links dampening filter, adding links while in the Sandbox solves two filters at once. If the newly added links are indeed dampened by a filter, then their full value should take effect just as your site comes out from the Sandbox. Be sure to add strong keyword rich anchor text to your incoming links, and vary it to include several keyword combinations.

How long it takes to appear in the SERPS after leaving the Sandbox?

The length of time required to achieve your site’s proper ranking is difficult to quantify as so many variables are taken into consideration. If you have been adding well anchor text covered inbound links from relevant websites, your rise will be much faster than someone who has not continued to add incoming links. It will also assist your site’s ascent to search prominence by constantly adding keyword rich content. Of course, the more competitive the keywords you are targetting, the longer and harder is the climb.

How can I avoid being placed in the Sandbox ?

The Sandbox can be avoided to a degree by making the site prior to its being fully ready for prime time. While the site will be placed in low rankings, it will start the clock ticking on its Sandbox duration time. Be sure to add as many incoming links as possible to get past the alleged new links dampening filter. Keep adding keyword rich content to your site. Anything that can be done to speed up your site’s appearance on the internet, including the purchase of an already existing domain, should be considered. With proper time management, a site can avoid the Google Sandbox entirely.

The Google Sandbox effect is an alleged restriction placed on new websites. The result is that a new site does not receive good rankings for its most important keywords and keyword phrases for few months. Even with good content, many inbound links, a new website may still adversely affected by the Sandbox effect. The Google Sandbox acts as a probation for new sites, probably to discourage spam sites from rising quickly, getting banned, and repeating the process.Thus the Google Sandbox is very similar to a new website being placed on probation whose rank is kept lower than expected in searches, prior to being given full value for its inbound links and content.

Why did Google create the Sandbox?

It is thought Google created the Sandbox filter for new sites to stop spam sites that purchase numerous inbound links, and rank highly for their keywords from the date of launch. As Google apparently considers a high number of links pointing to a site from the beginning to be rather suspicious, the inbound links are not considered to be natural. Another possibility is that spam sites would use various tactics to rise to the top of the search results, and gain heavy sales prior to being banned for violating Google’s Terms of Service; and then repeating the process continually. As a result, new sites are put on a probation period, and this effect is usually referred to as the Google Sandbox.

Is there really a Google Sandbox?

Not all SEO experts agree that Google Sandbox exists as a separate filter from other alleged Google filters. Many of them do not even agree that Google uses a system of filters at all. Skeptics believe that the phenomenon merely echoes already existing Google algorithm calculations, and the Sandbox effect is an illusion. Note that Google has all but admitted recently that the Sandbox filter is real.

Which sites are placed in the Sandbox?

While all types of new sites can be placed in the Google Sandbox, the problem appears much more frequently for new websites seeking rankings for highly competitive keywords and keyword phrases. All sites are likely to be given a term in the Sandbox, but those websites seeking rankings for keywords that are in high demand are probably in for a much longer duration in the sandbox.

Why some sites never seem to been in the Google Sandbox? You can avoid having your site in the Google Sandbox for several reasons. Sites targeting non-competitive keywords and phrases are often left out of the Google Sandbox as there is little point in applying the filter. Keep in mind, however, that even less competitive search terms can be Sandboxed, but their much shorter stay in the sandbox often goes entirely unnoticed.

How long is a site stays in the Google Sandbox?

Stays in the Google Sandbox can vary from one to six months, with th